PRODUCT DESIGN • OPERATIONS SYSTEMS • WORKFORCE PLANNING

Labor Planning System for Multi-Unit Restaurant Operations

Designed and launched a labor planning system that standardized scheduling and labor modeling across a multi-unit resort food & beverage operation, covering 20 outlets and enabling managers to plan staffing for a workforce of 400-600 employees during peak season.

Scope 20 outlets
Users ~40 managers & chefs
Frontline team 400-600 staff at peak
Outcome labor savings
Overview

The problem

Context

The Situation

Ahead of the 2025–2026 winter season, the focus was on improving labor efficiency while maintaining service standards across a large, multi-unit operation.

At the same time, managers across the organization were building schedules independently. This made it difficult to maintain consistency, and labor issues were often identified after schedules had already been published, leaving limited ability to adjust for overscheduling or overtime.

Constraints

Core Issues

No standardized scheduling framework across outlets
Overscheduling and overtime discovered too late
Complex job codes tied to payroll and tipping policies
High seasonal workforce movement between outlets
Limited visibility into labor before schedule approval
My Role

What I owned

01

System Design

Designed a full labor planning framework, including process logic, validation flows, staffing controls, and an adoption structure across all outlets.

02

Tooling

Developed the labor planning model, centralized scheduling templates, reporting tools, and validation mechanisms used by admins and leadership.

03

Rollout & Adoption

Trained managers, chefs, admins, and senior leadership, and implemented accountability and retraining workflows to drive adoption.

System Architecture

How the system worked

The labor planning system connected finance forecasts, staffing models, schedule creation, validation, and payroll into one repeatable operating flow.

Finance Forecast

  • Revenue projections
  • Room night forecasts
  • Skier visit forecasts

Labor Budget Model

  • Outlet labor budgets
  • Role-based staffing requirements
  • Pay rate assumptions

Labor Guideline Tool

  • Automated staffing calculations
  • Labor cost projections
  • Budget validation flags

Manager Scheduling

  • Weekly schedules built in Workday
  • Managers assign staff to shifts
  • Guideline model used for planning

Admin Validation

  • Centralized schedule review
  • Budget compliance validation
  • Schedules approved or returned

Monitoring & Payroll

  • Overtime risk reports
  • Open shift availability reports
  • Payroll approvals
Core Tool

Labor planning model

Tooling

Decision-support engine

The core tool was an Excel-based labor planning engine built from summer budget assumptions. Managers entered the payroll week start date and the model automatically generated staffing guidance, labor hours, and projected spend.

Labor planning model
Automated staffing recommendations by role and day
Labor spend calculated automatically from budgeted pay rates
Budget validation flags highlighted schedules that exceeded targets
Admins used the output to approve or reject schedules
Supporting Tooling

Centralized templates and SOPs

Labor directory
Operations Tool

Centralized Template Directory

Managers across 20 outlets accessed standardized scheduling templates from a centralized directory. This ensured every outlet used the same framework when building schedules.

Scheduling SOP
Process

Scheduling Standard Operating Procedure

The scheduling SOP defined submission deadlines, validation steps, escalation rules, and accountability workflows. This ensured schedules followed the labor framework before being approved.

Workflow

Weekly operating rhythm

Wednesday

Schedule submission

Managers submit schedules in Workday for approval.

Thursday

Leadership alignment

Senior leadership helps fill staffing gaps and align labor to outlet needs.

Friday

Admin validation

Admins run schedule validation and send approvals or correction requests.

Saturday

Final publishing

Approved schedules are finalized and published to staff.

Launch

Implementation and adoption

Timeline

Rollout timeline

SummerBudget development and staffing assumptions
SeptemberProcess planning
OctoberFramework development
NovemberTesting and training
Late NovemberLaunch for ski season start
Adoption

Change management

~90%of managers adopted the framework immediately
~10%required follow-up support and retraining
100%mid-season adoption across the department
Leadershipused a defined accountability process
Results

What changed

Significant labor savings compared to budget

20

Outlets aligned to one planning framework

40

Managers and chefs trained on the system

100%

Mid-season adoption across the department

Before vs After

Operational impact

Before

Before the system

Labor decisions were inconsistent, reactive, and hard to govern across outlets.

Managers scheduled independently
No standard staffing framework
Overtime often discovered too late
Limited labor visibility before approval
Inconsistent process across outlets
After

After the system

The department operated with a shared planning system tied directly to labor targets.

Budget-driven staffing guidance by outlet
Centralized schedule validation
Overtime risk flagged earlier
Managers used a shared planning system
Repeatable process across 20 outlets
Navigation

Finished this case study?

Head back to the project explorer to review more systems, strategy, and product work.